Up to 181 times more effective than other products.
While there are similar products available, their effectiveness is nowhere near that of COAT.
With data from Environment Ministry standards, we compare COAT effectiveness in the removal of vehicle exhaust gas (Nitrogen Oxides) with roadside poplar trees.
Product |
Area (m²) |
Nitrogen Oxide (g/m²) |
Equivalent in Poplars (No. trees) |
Company A, Product E |
1,000 |
※1.00μmol |
34.6 |
Company T, Product E EX |
1,000 |
0.052 |
95.0 |
Company T, Product H |
150 |
0.057 |
15.0 |
Company K, Product F |
1,000 |
- |
25.0 |
Company S, Product D |
160 |
0.077 |
21.0 |
Company D, Product S |
200 |
※0.56μmol |
2.4 |
COAT |
1,000 |
※8.62μmol 0.248 |
435.0 |
* Calculated assuming a nitrogen oxide concentration of 1 ppm, and photocatalyst area of 0.005 sq. m. for 5 hours (JIS standard testing methodology).
Research Institute: General Incorporated Foundation of Japan Environmental Management & Technology Center (EMATEC)
The results show that COAT is more effective than other products by a factor of between 4.6 and 181.